Reading time: 12 minutes

Overview

1. What is biological ageing?
2. Why do we age at all?
3. What happens inside our cells as we age?
4. When does biological ageing begin?
5. Why do people age at different rates?
6. Can biological ageing be measured?
7. Can biological ageing be influenced?
8. Open questions in ageing research
9. Frequently asked questions
10. Conclusion

Two people can be born on the same day and still develop very differently. One may remain resilient for a long time, while the other notices earlier that recovery, muscle strength or concentration are declining. Although their chronological age is the same, their bodies may show very different biological traces of ageing.

Ageing is not a single switch that is universally flipped on a particular birthday. It is a network of changes that unfolds over many years in cells, tissues and organs. Some changes arise from stress and damage, others from shifts in regulation and repair. Many of them influence one another.

This article explains why we age, what happens inside our cells and why biological ageing cannot be reduced to one cause or one measurement.

What is biological ageing?

To avoid misunderstandings, it helps to distinguish between three terms that frequently appear in discussions about ageing:

Chronological age describes how much time has passed since birth. It can be calculated precisely, but tells us only so much about the function of individual organs or body systems.

Biological age, by contrast, is not a directly readable value. It is an estimate derived from selected characteristics of the body. These may include DNA methylation patterns, blood proteins, metabolic markers, organ structures or several combined health parameters. Different methods can therefore produce different values for the same person.

Biological ageing is the process through which these changes arise. It describes not simply how old a body appears, but what changes over time within its cells, tissues and regulatory systems.

Chronological age describes elapsed lifetime, biological age is an estimated state, and biological ageing is the underlying process.

This distinction matters. A biological-age test attempts to represent a complex process using one or more measurements. The process itself, however, is broader than any individual method.

Why do we age at all?

There is still no single, definitive answer to this question. One widely accepted and scientifically well-supported idea is that damage and dysregulation arise continually throughout life, while the body attempts to offset them through repair and renewal. As we grow older, that compensation gradually becomes less effective.

For illustration, life can be simplified into two phases. During the first half of life, growth, development and regeneration tend to predominate. Damage already arises from birth – in DNA, proteins and other cellular components – but the body has highly capable repair systems. Damaged molecules are replaced, defective cell components are broken down and many errors are successfully corrected. The body can compensate for most of these changes without us noticing them.

During the second half of life, this balance gradually shifts. Damage continues to arise at a similar or sometimes higher rate, while repair and renewal no longer operate as efficiently as before. More small changes persist, accumulate over the years and influence one another. This growing imbalance between damage and repair is what gradually makes the typical features of biological ageing visible and noticeable.

What happens inside our cells as we age?

Modern ageing research describes twelve closely interconnected biological processes known as the Hallmarks of Ageing. Together they provide a scientific framework for understanding the mechanisms that contribute to biological ageing. They include genomic instability, telomere shortening, epigenetic alterations, loss of protein quality control, impaired autophagy, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem-cell exhaustion and chronic inflammatory processes.

This collection of mechanisms can appear complex at first. In reality, the individual hallmarks are closely linked and influence one another. To make this interaction easier to understand, this article groups them into six broader process groups. This is an editorial simplification for clarity: in biology, the boundaries are fluid and many mechanisms operate at the same time.

Biological ageing develops as a network: changes in DNA, gene regulation, proteins, mitochondria, cell states and communication influence one another.

1. The genome comes under increasing strain

DNA is the blueprint of every cell. Far from being static, it is exposed every day to internal and external influences and can sustain damage. Metabolic processes, ultraviolet radiation, environmental factors and spontaneous molecular changes can all affect the genome. Fortunately, the body has sophisticated repair systems that identify and correct much of this damage. Repair is not always complete, however, and some changes can persist and accumulate over the years.

As a result, genomic stability can gradually decline. This does not mean that older cells are automatically diseased or dangerous. Rather, the likelihood increases that errors will accumulate, repair mechanisms will no longer work as reliably, or individual cell functions will become restricted.

Closely connected with this process are telomeres. These protective caps sit at the ends of chromosomes and help prevent genetic information from being lost during cell division. Because telomeres shorten during many cell divisions, they can eventually signal a cell to stop dividing or enter a different functional state.

Telomeres were long regarded as a kind of biological clock. We now know that their significance is more complex. Telomere length varies between tissues and individuals, is influenced by genetic and environmental factors, and depends on the measurement method. Telomeres are therefore an important feature of biological ageing, but only one of many and certainly not its sole cause.

2. The regulation of our genes changes

Almost all cells contain the same DNA, yet a muscle cell performs a very different role from a nerve cell or liver cell. The difference lies not in the genetic blueprint itself but in which genes are active in a cell and which are not. Gene activity is regulated in part by epigenetic mechanisms.

These epigenetic marks change continually throughout life. Many changes are entirely normal and allow the body to adapt to development, the environment or stress. Others are associated with altered gene activity, loss of cellular identity or age-related changes in function.

So-called epigenetic clocks are based on such changes. They analyse characteristic patterns of DNA methylation and use them to estimate a person's biological age statistically.

This makes epigenetics one of the most compelling fields in ageing research. At the same time, caution is necessary: one DNA methylation value cannot fully represent the complex ageing process. Epigenetic clocks capture a particular biological aspect and should not be equated with a person's entire biological age.

3. Proteins and cellular clean-up systems come under pressure

Proteins perform countless roles as enzymes, receptors, transporters, antibodies and structural building blocks. To work reliably, they must be produced correctly, folded into the right shape, monitored continually and broken down when damaged. This finely balanced state is known as proteostasis.

Cells use an elaborate quality-control system. Chaperone proteins help newly formed proteins assume the correct structure. Damaged or unnecessary proteins are broken down by the proteasome, while autophagy identifies larger cellular components or defective organelles and directs them towards lysosomal degradation. Together, these mechanisms help prevent non-functional components from accumulating.

With age, this quality control can become less efficient. Misfolded proteins and damaged cell components may be removed less effectively and gradually accumulate. These deposits can disrupt important cell functions and trigger additional stress responses, placing the cell under still greater strain.

4. Mitochondria and energy regulation change

Mitochondria are often called the “powerhouses of the cell”. While this is not wrong, it describes only part of their role. Mitochondria produce most cellular energy in the form of ATP, but they also regulate metabolism, respond to stress, help coordinate stress responses and continually signal to the cell nucleus and other structures. They therefore influence how a cell adapts to changing conditions and whether it can maintain its functions.

As we age, mitochondrial quality, number and dynamics can change, while quality control often becomes less efficient. Damaged mitochondria may no longer be identified and removed reliably through mitophagy, a specialised form of autophagy. Their function and the cell's energy supply can then gradually deteriorate.

The consequences extend far beyond reduced energy production. Altered mitochondria can affect metabolism, intensify stress signals and promote inflammation or cellular senescence. Other ageing mechanisms also feed back onto mitochondria. DNA damage, impaired autophagy, altered nutrient sensing and chronic inflammation are all closely interconnected with mitochondrial function.

Mitochondria are therefore not an isolated cause of ageing but a central node in its biological network. For a closer look at their structure, functions and role in cellular energy, read The Hidden Engine of Your Body: How ATP and Mitochondria Drive Energy.

5. Some cells enter senescence

Not every damaged cell is removed immediately. If a cell experiences severe DNA damage or prolonged stress signalling, it may enter a special state: it permanently stops dividing but remains metabolically active. This state is known as cellular senescence.

Senescence is not inherently harmful. It is an important protective mechanism: preventing heavily damaged cells from multiplying can reduce the risk of uncontrolled growth. Senescence also plays important roles in embryonic development, tissue regeneration and wound healing.

It can become problematic when senescent cells accumulate in tissues with age. Although they no longer divide, they remain biologically active and release signalling molecules that can promote inflammation, affect neighbouring cells and alter the tissue environment. In this way, they may intensify other ageing processes.

Senescent cells are sometimes called “zombie cells”, but this popular term can be misleading. Senescence is not a distinct type of cell; it is a complex state that can have both protective and detrimental effects depending on the context.

6. Stem cells, the immune system and cellular communication change

For tissues to remain functional over decades, damaged or old cells must be continually replaced. Stem and progenitor cells play a central part by producing new cells and supporting tissue regeneration. At the same time, virtually all cells communicate through signalling molecules. This coordination aligns growth, repair, immune defence and metabolism.

Both systems change with age. Stem cells gradually lose some of their regenerative capacity, and their immediate environment – the stem-cell niche – also changes. Tissues may therefore become less able to compensate for damage than they were in younger years.

Communication between cells, tissues and the immune system also shifts. One well-known feature of this process is inflammaging.

This low-grade inflammatory activity is not comparable to an acute infection. It can arise from many signals that accumulate over a lifetime, including cellular debris, metabolic changes, senescent cells and changes in the gut microbiome. An unhealthy diet can also promote inflammatory processes. Conversely, chronic disease and inflammation can intensify these processes and influence other mechanisms of biological ageing.

This hallmark again shows that ageing is not caused by one defect. Over time, the finely balanced interaction between regeneration, cellular communication and the immune system changes, with effects across almost every organ and tissue.

When does biological ageing begin?

The short answer is that biological ageing does not begin on one particular birthday. In a broad sense, it accompanies us throughout life.

Molecular changes begin in our cells soon after birth. At the same time, the young body has exceptionally capable repair and regeneration mechanisms that can offset most of them. Growth, development and adaptation therefore dominate at first, while the effects of ageing are barely perceptible.

Over the years, this balance gradually shifts. Damage and dysregulation continue to arise, but repair and renewal no longer operate equally efficiently in every tissue. Small changes can accumulate and eventually affect the function of cells and organs.

The body also does not age at the same rate everywhere. The brain, skin, muscles, immune system and liver can show very different patterns in the same person. Even different cell types within one organ can age at different rates. Biological ageing is therefore neither linear nor synchronised.

A chronological birthday is not a biological turning point. Ageing is a continuous process that develops over decades. Although the underlying changes begin early, their effects often become visible or noticeable only later. This is why two people of the same age can differ markedly in physical capacity, recovery and resilience.

Why do people age at different rates?

Two people can be the same chronological age and still age very differently. One may remain physically and mentally capable well into later life, while the other develops age-related limitations much earlier. Biological ageing is shaped by many factors at once.

Genes play an important part. They influence repair systems, metabolism, immune responses and susceptibility to certain diseases, providing a biological framework. They do not, however, determine the exact rate at which a person ages.

Environmental and lifestyle factors are equally important. They include physical activity, sleep, diet, smoking, alcohol consumption and persistent psychosocial stress. Environmental exposures, infections, chronic illness, healthcare and social conditions may also influence ageing. What matters is not one isolated factor but their interaction over many years or decades.

Our article Why Your Lifestyle Is More Important Than Your Genes explores these modifiable influences in greater detail. Its title is deliberately bold: a healthy lifestyle cannot completely control or stop ageing, but it can support important biological systems and improve the conditions for ageing as healthily as possible.

Biological chance also plays a part. Not every mutation, immune response or cellular decision can be explained by genes, lifestyle or environment. Many biological processes are subject to natural variation that can add up over decades. Even people with similar genes and habits can therefore age differently.

Can biological ageing be measured?

Biological ageing is a complex process involving many organs and systems at once. No current method can capture the entirety of a person's ageing process.

Researchers instead use different approaches to examine particular aspects, including:

• epigenetic clocks based on DNA methylation,
• telomere-length measurements,
• proteins or metabolites in the blood,
• patterns of gene activity,
• medical imaging of individual organs,
• functional measures such as strength, lung function or exercise capacity,
• combined models using several biomarkers.

Each method looks at only one part of biological ageing. Some clocks were designed to predict chronological age as precisely as possible. Others aim to indicate disease or mortality risk, or estimate how quickly particular biological changes are occurring.

Statements such as “your biological age is five years younger than your actual age” can therefore sound more definitive than they are. The result depends on the method, the tissue examined, the reference dataset and the timing of the measurement. Different tests may produce different results for the same person.

Biological-age clocks are valuable research tools. They help scientists understand ageing and track changes over time. Their results should nevertheless be interpreted cautiously rather than treated as a comprehensive judgement of one individual's health or life expectancy.

For a related example of how biological ageing is investigated in human research, read Surprising Insights in Ageing Research: How Biological Age Increases in Leaps.

Can biological ageing be slowed or reversed?

The idea of stopping or even reversing biological ageing has fascinated scientists and the public for decades. Current evidence, however, offers no scientifically established way to stop human ageing completely or rejuvenate the whole body.

That does not mean ageing processes cannot be influenced at all. Studies have shown that certain biological mechanisms and individual biomarkers can change following various interventions. These findings are scientifically interesting, but they should not automatically be interpreted as rejuvenation of the entire body.

Epigenetic clocks are a useful example. If a clock value changes after an intervention, it initially tells us only that this particular biomarker has changed. It does not by itself prove that every organ functions more youthfully, age-related diseases have been prevented or lifespan has been extended.

This scientific caution does not make lifestyle irrelevant. There is good evidence that regular physical activity, sufficient sleep, a balanced diet, not smoking, moderate alcohol consumption and consistent management of existing risk factors support many biological systems involved in ageing. They cannot abolish ageing, but they can help us remain healthy and capable for longer.

This is why researchers often prefer healthy ageing to “anti-ageing”. The focus is increasingly on healthspan – the period of life spent in good health – rather than lifespan alone. The aim is not to prevent every biological change but to preserve the function of cells, organs and regulatory systems for as long as possible: not necessarily merely to live longer, but to spend our years in better health, with activity and quality of life.

What ageing research still cannot answer with certainty

Ageing research has made enormous progress. The Hallmarks of Ageing provide a well-established scientific model describing many central mechanisms, yet fundamental questions remain unresolved:

• Which ageing mechanisms initiate a development, and which are consequences?
• Which processes matter most in each organ?
• Why do organs within the same person age at different rates?
• Which biological-age clock is most informative for which question?
• When does a biomarker change lead to a lasting health benefit?
• Which findings from cell cultures or model organisms can be transferred to humans?

These open questions make ageing research one of the most compelling fields in modern medicine. They also show why results require careful interpretation. A plausible biological mechanism does not automatically imply a health benefit, and statistical correlation does not prove causation. Robust conclusions about practical relevance require confirmation in high-quality human studies.

Research continually reviews assumptions and adapts models in light of new evidence. For biological ageing – one of the most complex processes in the human body – that scientific process is essential.

Frequently asked questions about biological ageing

What is biological ageing?

Biological ageing is the progressive process through which cells, tissues and organs change over the course of life. Repair, regulation, regeneration and resilience can decline. The process is complex and involves many interconnected biological systems.

What is the difference between biological ageing and biological age?

Biological ageing is the process. Biological age is an estimated state described using selected biomarkers or functional measurements. The estimate can vary depending on the method used.

Why do our cells age?

Cells age through an interaction of damage, altered gene regulation, declining quality control, mitochondrial changes, senescence and altered communication. No single cause explains the entire ageing process.

When does biological ageing begin?

There is no universal starting point. Molecular changes begin at different times and organs do not age synchronously. Visible or noticeable effects usually develop gradually.

What role do telomeres play in cellular ageing?

Telomeres protect chromosome ends and shorten during many cell divisions. Critically short or damaged telomeres can affect a cell's division and function. They are one feature among many, not a precise personal clock of life.

Can biological age be measured reliably?

Several scientific methods exist, but there is no universal gold standard for a person's overall biological age. Epigenetic clocks, blood markers, imaging and functional tests each examine different aspects and may produce different results.

Can biological ageing be reversed?

Certain biomarkers and functions can change or improve. That does not automatically mean the whole body has been rejuvenated. A complete reversal of human ageing has not been scientifically demonstrated.

Conclusion: Ageing is a network, not a single switch

Biological ageing is not one process and has no single cause. It develops through the interaction of many mechanisms. Changes in DNA, gene regulation, protein quality, mitochondria, stem cells and communication between cells and the immune system influence one another in a tightly connected network. Some mechanisms initially protect the body and become problematic only when they remain active or lose their regulation.

This complexity explains why two people with the same chronological age can age differently. It also explains why biological ageing cannot be reduced to one cause, biomarker or test.

Researchers now understand far more about the processes involved in ageing and how they interact. Many questions remain – and this is one of the strengths of modern science: its models continue to evolve and established findings are repeatedly tested.

We cannot yet measure or halt biological ageing completely. We can, however, increasingly understand the factors that influence health and function over decades. This knowledge may not allow us to extend every life, but it can help improve the chances of spending more of our years in good health, with activity and a high quality of life.

References

López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe. Cell. 2023 Jan 19;186(2):243–278. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.001. PMID: 36599349.

Schumacher B, Pothof J, Vijg J, Hoeijmakers JHJ. The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process. Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7856):695–703. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03307-7. PMID: 33911272; PMCID: PMC9844150.

Chakravarti D, LaBella KA, DePinho RA. Telomeres: history, health, and hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2021 Jan 21;184(2):306–322. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.028. PMID: 33450206; PMCID: PMC8081271.

Ye Q, Apsley AT, Etzel L, et al. Telomere length and chronological age across the human lifespan: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 414 study samples including 743,019 individuals. Ageing Res Rev. 2023 Sep;90:102031. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.102031. PMID: 37567392; PMCID: PMC10529491.

Kaushik S, Tasset I, Arias E, et al. Autophagy and the hallmarks of aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Dec;72:101468. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101468. PMID: 34563704; PMCID: PMC8616816.

Sun N, Youle RJ, Finkel T. The Mitochondrial Basis of Aging. Mol Cell. 2016 Mar 3;61(5):654–666. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.028. PMID: 26942670; PMCID: PMC4779179.

Gorgoulis V, Adams PD, Alimonti A, et al. Cellular Senescence: Defining a Path Forward. Cell. 2019 Oct 31;179(4):813–827. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.005. PMID: 31675495.

Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Parini P, Giuliani C, Santoro A. Inflammaging: a new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 Oct;14(10):576–590. doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0059-4. PMID: 30046148.

Jylhävä J, Pedersen NL, Hägg S. Biological Age Predictors. EBioMedicine. 2017 Jul;21:29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.046. PMID: 28396265; PMCID: PMC5514388.

Bell CG, Lowe R, Adams PD, et al. DNA methylation aging clocks: challenges and recommendations. Genome Biol. 2019 Nov 25;20(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1824-y. PMID: 31767039; PMCID: PMC6876109.

Reichard M. Evolutionary perspectives on ageing. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Oct;70:99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.05.013. PMID: 28554569.